The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) company has been utilizing an AI-powered device referred to as Big Oak Search Expertise (GOST) to scan visa candidates’ social media posts since 2014, in keeping with paperwork obtained by way of a Freedom of Data Act motion.
In accordance with an Oct. 27 TechSpot report, the system provides candidates a “social media rating” from 1-100 based mostly on whether or not their posts are deemed “derogatory” in the direction of the US. ICE analysts can then assessment flagged pictures and profiles to find out if candidates are a danger.
ICE has paid Big Oak over $10 million since 2017 for the know-how, which additionally has contracts with the DEA, Air Power, State Division, and Treasury Division. Privateness advocates argue any such AI screening raises vital civil liberties points.
Ought to the federal government use algorithms to look social media to find out who’s “dangerous?”
“The federal government shouldn’t be utilizing algorithms to scrutinize our social media posts and resolve which of us is ‘dangerous,’” mentioned Patrick Toomey deputy director of the ACLU’s nationwide safety venture. “DHS wants to elucidate to the general public how its programs decide whether or not somebody is a danger or not, and what occurs to the individuals whose on-line posts are flagged by its algorithms.”
The social media surveillance program began as a 2016 pilot focusing on potential visa overstayers. That very same yr, the Trump administration applied guidelines requiring visa candidates to supply 5 years of social media historical past.
Specialists warn these practices may result in discrimination, with candidates from sure nations or backgrounds extra prone to be flagged by automated programs. In 2019, a Harvard scholar was denied entry to the U.S. due to pals’ social media exercise.
In accordance with the data, ICE’s contract with Big Oak resulted in 2022. Nonetheless, the observe of utilizing AI to evaluate candidates’ social media raises questions on privateness, accountability, and equity in immigration enforcement. Extra oversight is required to forestall abuse and shield civil liberties.
Featured Picture Credit score: Picture by Karolina Grabowska; Pexels; Thanks!
